China's Dark Legacy in Lhasa: Decades of Suppression and Cultural Genocide | Opinion

The city of Lhasa, once the heart of Tibetan civilisation and the spiritual seat of the Dalai Lama, has been systematically transformed into a militarised outpost of state control. For over six decades, Beijing has imposed an iron-fisted administrative and ideological grip on Tibet, aimed not only at political integration but at the deeper objective of cultural erasure. Under layers of infrastructural modernisation and security expansion lies a brutal reality: suppression of Tibetan religion, language, and identity. Lhasa today is a heavily surveilled environment where expressions of cultural authenticity are interpreted as threats to national unity. The state narrative may speak of development and stability, but the everyday reality is one of religious censorship, linguistic marginalisation, and population engineering.

Religious Institutions Subverted, Monastic Life Disbanded

The targeting of Tibetan Buddhism remains at the core of China's regional strategy. Monasteries such as Sera, Ganden, and Drepung, once centres of spiritual and philosophical learning, have been converted into state-monitored institutions. Religious leaders are vetted by party authorities, and religious teachings are subject to political scrutiny. Inside temples and monastic complexes, the traditional thangka paintings now hang alongside mandatory portraits of Chinese leaders.

Monks and nuns undergo periodic "patriotic education," a euphemism for ideological reconditioning, where loyalty to the Communist Party is drilled into clergy alongside the tenets of Buddhism. Recitation of religious texts is closely monitored, and many monastic libraries have been subjected to content vetting or outright confiscation.

The Language Offensive: Mandarin as the New Cultural Anchor

Language, the conduit of cultural transmission, has not been spared. Tibetans are gradually being sidelined in education and public life through a systematic Mandarinisation of the school curriculum. From early education onwards, children in urban areas, including Lhasa, are taught primarily in Mandarin. Boarding schools, designed to separate Tibetan children from their cultural roots under the pretext of improving access to education, have seen exponential growth. These institutions not only impose Mandarin as the medium of instruction but also systematically dilute indigenous culture, religion, and community ties. Parents are left with little choice. Refusing state schooling for their children is considered subversive.

Renaming the Land: Sinicisation of Tibetan Geography

Alongside linguistic and religious suppression, the renaming of Tibetan geographical and cultural sites represents a symbolic yet powerful instrument of cultural erasure. Ancient Tibetan place names are increasingly being replaced or superseded by Mandarin names designed to reflect a homogenised Chinese identity. For example, many traditional place names in and around Lhasa have been substituted with administrative Mandarin nomenclature. Sacred pilgrimage sites, historic villages, and monasteries are rebranded with names that bear no connection to their Tibetan origins. These new names are used exclusively in state maps and official publications, effectively overwriting the cultural memory embedded in local geography.

Also read: China's Faltering Firepower: An Embarrassment in the Global Arms Market

Demographic Alteration: The Quiet Reengineering of Identity

Demographic transformation has been one of the most effective tools in altering the character of Lhasa and other key Tibetan regions. Over the past three decades, incentivised migration policies have brought a steady influx of Han Chinese settlers into Tibet. These settlers are often provided housing, employment, and social benefits unavailable to native Tibetans. The demographic composition of Lhasa has undergone a stark transformation. Han settlers dominate the retail, construction, and service sectors, while Tibetans remain underrepresented in administrative and skilled employment. Urban development projects are centred around Han-majority zones, pushing traditional Tibetan neighbourhoods to the periphery, both spatially and economically.

Surveillance as Suppression: Living Under Constant Watch

The scale and density of surveillance infrastructure in Lhasa rivals that of any major metropolitan city in China. Security checkpoints are ubiquitous, with facial recognition systems integrated into public transport, marketplaces, and even monastery gates. Biometric data collection is routine, and social credit mechanisms are being extended to monitor behaviour aligned with political loyalty. The digital tracking of religious activities, association patterns, and online communication has created a climate of fear where cultural expression is policed as a security threat. Dissent, even in passive forms such as possessing banned religious images or Tibetan literature, is met with detention or re-education. The use of artificial intelligence and big data analytics to preempt unrest has turned Lhasa into a laboratory of state surveillance. In this city, the act of preserving one's cultural identity can attract punitive consequences.

International Attention, Limited Accountability

While international institutions and parliaments continue to pass resolutions condemning China's actions in Tibet, tangible political pressure remains inconsistent. Diplomatic engagement with China often subordinates human rights concerns to economic considerations. Multilateral forums frequently treat the Tibetan issue as peripheral despite it reflecting broader trends of authoritarian cultural repression.

Countries like India remain key stakeholders for geographical proximity and their enduring role as hosts to the Tibetan exile community. Yet the global response remains sporadic, often limited to symbolic gestures rather than a coordinated pushback against cultural genocide.

The transformation of Lhasa over the last six decades is not merely a story of urbanisation. It is a chronicle of methodical cultural destruction. Religion has been censored, language diluted, place names rewritten, and a proud civilisation rendered invisible beneath layers of concrete and surveillance grids. Cultural genocide does not always take the form of violent annihilation.

It often unfolds through bureaucratic policies, demographic engineering, linguistic erasure, and ideological indoctrination. What is happening in Lhasa is precisely such a slow-motion destruction, designed not to draw headlines but to ensure that the next generation of Tibetans may not remember who they are. This legacy must be confronted in seminars or reports, as well as sustained global awareness and policy action. The identity of a people is not negotiable, and Tibet's erasure must not be the price of diplomatic convenience.

Also read: Blood in the Waters: China's Violent Expansionism in the South China Sea | Opinion

(Ashu Maan is an Associate Fellow at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. He is currently pursuing his PhD from Amity University, Noida, in Defence and Strategic Studies.)